Electronic loudness in the 2000s

-10.7 Median integrated LUFS
-31.2 to -5.6 Range
133 Tracks

Loudness distribution

-32 to -31 LUFS: 1 track-31 to -30 LUFS: 0 tracks-30 to -29 LUFS: 0 tracks-29 to -28 LUFS: 0 tracks-28 to -27 LUFS: 0 tracks-27 to -26 LUFS: 0 tracks-26 to -25 LUFS: 0 tracks-25 to -24 LUFS: 1 track-24 to -23 LUFS: 0 tracks-23 to -22 LUFS: 0 tracks-22 to -21 LUFS: 0 tracks-21 to -20 LUFS: 0 tracks-20 to -19 LUFS: 5 tracks-19 to -18 LUFS: 7 tracks-18 to -17 LUFS: 1 track-17 to -16 LUFS: 5 tracks-16 to -15 LUFS: 5 tracks-15 to -14 LUFS: 4 tracks-14 to -13 LUFS: 3 tracks-13 to -12 LUFS: 9 tracks-12 to -11 LUFS: 17 tracks-11 to -10 LUFS: 24 tracks-10 to -9 LUFS: 15 tracks-9 to -8 LUFS: 16 tracks-8 to -7 LUFS: 15 tracks-7 to -6 LUFS: 4 tracks-6 to -5 LUFS: 1 track -32 LUFS -19 LUFS -5 LUFS

Dynamic range distribution

7 to 8 DR: 1 track8 to 9 DR: 1 track9 to 10 DR: 10 tracks10 to 11 DR: 16 tracks11 to 12 DR: 18 tracks12 to 13 DR: 16 tracks13 to 14 DR: 18 tracks14 to 15 DR: 18 tracks15 to 16 DR: 10 tracks16 to 17 DR: 8 tracks17 to 18 DR: 4 tracks18 to 19 DR: 9 tracks19 to 20 DR: 1 track20 to 21 DR: 2 tracks21 to 22 DR: 1 track 7 DR 14 DR 22 DR

Loudest and quietest

Loudest: Wrong
-5.6 LUFS
Quietest: Dream Time
-31.2 LUFS

Most-represented engineers

Stephen Marcussen
n=24 · median -8.6 LUFS
Stuart Hawkes
n=17 · median -7.7 LUFS
Emily Lazar
n=12 · median -18.5 LUFS
Brian Gardner
n=8 · median -11.1 LUFS

Other decades

← Electronic in the 1990s · Electronic in the 2010s →

This database is hand-curated and not exhaustive — treat this cohort as a sample of 133 measured tracks, not a survey of every Electronic release from the 2000s.